Our blog has moved!
Milwaukee Talkie, the blog of the Public Policy Forum has moved.
Our new blog address is: www.publicpolicyforum.org/blog.
Please update your bookmarks and RSS feeds accordingly.
A Public Policy Forum blog
Milwaukee Talkie, the blog of the Public Policy Forum has moved.
Our new blog address is: www.publicpolicyforum.org/blog.
Please update your bookmarks and RSS feeds accordingly.
Posted by Jeff Schmidt at 3:43 PM
As Governor Walker prepares his biennial budget, anticipation
is building over whether he will propose additional state investment for workforce development. The Public Policy Forum’s July 2012 report on Wisconsin’s workforce development system identified 36 programs in nine state departments that provided employment and training services in fiscal year 2012,
and found that a vast majority of the $407 million supporting those programs
came from federal sources, with only $34 million (8%) contributed by the state.
The state contributed funds for 13 of the 36 workforce programs it administered in 2012, with nearly half of the state funding going to vocational rehabilitation. According to Competitive Wisconsin’s recently-released Be
Bold 2 report, $19.3 million of the state’s total contributions were
matching funds required by federal programs, while only $14.7 million
represented state appropriations.
Past Forum research has indicated that Wisconsin may be more dependent on federal funding for workforce development than neighboring states, and has shown that federal
funding has been decreasing over the long term, a trend that does not appear
likely to change in the near future due to the current fiscal pressures facing the
federal government.
The governor will present his budget in February.
Posted by Joe Peterangelo at 3:00 PM
Labels: Peterangelo, PPF Pearls, state budget, workforce development
If it’s December, then it must be time for the Forum’s
annual list of its top five research findings of the year. Last year’s list included findings on MMSD’s
daunting capital needs, the dramatic decline in Milwaukee County’s corrections
population, the City of Milwaukee's reliance on state shared revenue, and our
region’s tardiness in embracing strategic economic development planning. The 2012 list is summarized below in
chronological order:
Posted by Rob Henken at 8:46 AM
Labels: early childhood education, Henken, MATC, MPS, school choice, shared services, workforce development
When the Public Policy Forum decided to dive deeply into the finances of the Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) six months ago, we did so with considerable trepidation. Having tracked MPS' finances on a general level for the past several years, we were well aware of the district's huge retiree health care liability, the fiscal threat posed by declining enrollment, and the impacts of the latest state budget. Despite the good news we were hearing from MPS officials about the impacts of soon-to-be-implemented fringe benefit changes, we were concerned about precisely what we would find when we lifted the hood and dug into the mechanics of MPS' finances.
Today, after completing our comprehensive assessment of MPS' fiscal condition, we are relieved to say that the school district’s short-term fiscal outlook is not as ominous as we had feared. In fact, the district’s most recent five-year forecast projects a 2017 deficit of about $41 million, which is actually more optimistic than similar forecasts prepared by the City of Milwaukee and Milwaukee County. We also find, however, that the volatile and uncontrollable fiscal environment in which the district must operate creates an “untenable fiscal structure” that continues to raise serious questions about MPS' longer-term future.
Our 84-page report - entitled Passing the Test, But Making the Grade? and released this morning – uses the same fiscal monitoring methodology used previously for reports on Milwaukee County, the City of Milwaukee, MATC, and MMSD. It examines fiscal trends, compares MPS to state and national peers, and analyzes the causes and scope of the district’s fiscal challenges.
A major undercurrent of the report is MPS' lack of control over its own financial destiny. The district is far more dependent than other local governments on state funding, and much more susceptible to fiscal upheaval from policy and program decisions made in Madison and elsewhere. Those decisions not only can involve state appropriations and revenue limits, but also regulatory changes to charter school or private school choice programs that can sharply affect MPS enrollment. MPS' finances also can be hit hard by the chartering decisions of outside entities, and by demographic trends impacting the city.
Other key findings from the Forum's new report on MPS' financial condition:
Posted by Rob Henken at 7:00 AM
Labels: education, government finance, Henken, MPS
In a new report examining Milwaukee’s workforce development system, the Public Policy Forum cites a higher level of coordination and cohesion among key workforce development players since the establishment of the Milwaukee Area Workforce Investment Board (MAWIB) in 2007, but suggests a need for better coordination between the city’s economic development priorities and the needs of its unemployed.
The report –
"Pathways to Employment"
– analyzes the resources, programming, and priorities of MAWIB and the Milwaukee Area Technical
College (MATC), widely considered the two
most prominent workforce development entities in Milwaukee, and also summarizes
the activities and spending of other key workforce agencies. In addition, the
report explores promising efforts to coordinate workforce development
activities in Milwaukee’s health care, manufacturing, and food and beverage sectors.
On the whole, we find that sector-specific workforce strategies show considerable
promise for the economy at large, but that many of the individuals being served
by MAWIB may not have the education or skill levels to meet the requirements of
area employers in sectors being targeted by economic development leaders – like
advanced manufacturing, financial services, and water – or to benefit from
related technical diploma programs at MATC or WCTC. As Milwaukee identifies
economic development goals, therefore, it is important to determine the extent
to which those goals should influence workforce development policies and programs.
That is not to suggest the individuals MAWIB serves cannot advance beyond low-skill,
entry-level positions through additional work experience and/or education, nor
that the sectors targeted by regional economic development efforts should
change. It does suggest, however, that MAWIB‘s role as the entity serving those
with the greatest barriers to employment demands a commitment to a broad array
of services and strategies that respond both to the needs of key industry
sectors and the needs of its clientele.
Other key findings from the report include the following:
Posted by Joe Peterangelo at 6:30 AM
Labels: economic development, employment, Peterangelo, workforce development
Across the state, school accountability has been a hot
topic in recent weeks, including the first release
of individual school
report cards in late October, which sparked
lively public discussion about how to effectively measure and improve
school quality, student achievement, and teacher effectiveness.
Posted by Anne Chapman at 8:00 AM
Labels: achievement gap, Chapman, education, school budgets
Few would dispute the idea that effective mental
health care relies on the quality and accessibility of health care
professionals, especially nurses. As stakeholders in Milwaukee County work to
redesign the county’s mental health system, one of the crucial issues they face
is how to build an effective and efficient mental health nursing workforce in
light of anticipated changes under the new system.
Posted by Anneliese at 8:30 AM
Labels: Dickman, health care, mental health, milwaukee county, survey